Skip to Main Content

Peer Assessment using forums, database and workshop guide

Explore the options available for peer assessment activities and assessment in Moodle.

About Peer Assessment

Peer assessment is the assessment of students' work by their peers against set assessment criteria.

In general, there are two types of peer assessments:

  • Assessment of team contribution in group work - members of a group assess the performance of the peers in terms of their contribution to the group's work.
  • Assessment of coursework undertaken by other students - students provide feedback/grades on their peers' work.

In either case, self-assessment may be included as part of peer assessment. Self-assessment requires students to reflect on their own work and judge how well they have performed in relation to the assessment criteria. Developing reflective skills provides students with the ability to consider their own performance and to identify their strengths, weaknesses, and areas that require improvement. Students can then use this knowledge to influence their future work, whether on a programme of study or in employment.

It is crucial that at the outset, students understand the purpose of peer assessment and how their performance will be assessed.

Benefits of Peer Assessment

  • Peer assessment encourages deep learning. It develops the capacity for students to reflect on and evaluate their own learning and skill development.
  • Peer assessment gets students involved and allows them to be an active agent in assessment procedures.
  • Peer assessment helps students to develop a clearer understanding of assessment criteria. It enables students to understand what constitutes good work and work towards improvement in future work.
  • Peer assessment of team contributions promotes a sense of fairness in group work. As group members themselves know best about the relative contributions of individual members, they are empowered to reward members who contribute significantly or positively to the group work with higher mark. By doing so, students are encouraged to reflect on their role and contribution to the process of the group work.
  • By assessing or evaluating each other’s work, students take up the role of appraisers and, over time, acquire the skills they need to make judgements on their own work (Sadler, 2010).
  • Peer assessment 'allows students to recognise areas of their strength and weakness as team members (Lerchenfeldt et. al., 2019).
  • Peer assessment 'is an effective way for each student to participate actively in a team project'. 'An instructor may not observe all the processes occurring within the student groups. Typically, instructors evaluate the quality of the final product without knowledge of the team work process' (Lee & Lim, 2012).
  • Knowing that their contribution will be graded by their peers can help students to contribute effectively to the group effort.

References

  • Lee, H.-J., & Lim, C. (2012). Peer Evaluation in Blended Team Project-Based Learning: What Do Students Find Important? Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), pp.214–224.
  • Lerchenfeldt, S., Mi, M. & Eng, M. (2019). The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education 19, 321.
  • Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Considerations when choosing a peer assessment option

Listed below are some considerations to ensure the right peer assessment option is selected.

Why are you using peer assessment?

The purpose of using peer assessment needs to be communicated clearly to both students and colleagues so that they know what is expected of them and the learning benefits of the peer assessment exercise.

What will be assessed?

Team contribution, student work or combination of both.

Who will be assessing whom?

  • Individuals assess individual or group work, or
  • Students work in collaboration to assess other groups’ work, and/or
  • Students assess their own work (self-assessment), and/or
  • Lecturer moderates peer grades and feedback.

Where will the peer assessment take place?

In-class / Take-home. Marking in class has the advantage in that it can help students to develop a wider range of communication skills, allow their work to be shared with the rest of the class, and enable them to receive immediate feedback.

How does it work with assessment tasks and workflow?

  • Clear assessment criteria and grading scheme are essential to supporting 'good' peer assessment. Ensure that students are not just awarding marks to each other but fully understand the assessment requirements and the difference between the grades.
  • Grades or comments/feedback, or both. Students can gain more from giving than receiving feedback through developing skills of evaluative judgement, engaging more closely with the assessment criteria for the task and articulating their thinking.
  • Peer assessment can be done openly, encouraging comparison and discussion, or anonymously depending on the assessment task and context.
  • Marking allocation - how markers are allocated and why.

Options for Peer Assessment in Moodle

Peer assessment of contribution to group work

There are three options for students to assess their peers' contribution to the group work. Each has pros and cons.

  • Moodle Peer Assessment activity
    • Group members assess each other's contribution to a piece of group work.
    • Student reflect on the whole group work process against several preset criteria, and may be required to add a comment to justify their assessment.
    • Students receive one final mark for the group work which is adjusted based on their team contribution.
    • Self-assessment can be enabled.
  • Moodle Workshop activity
    • Self-assessment can be enabled.
    • Students are required to make a blank submission.
  • Please note: Moodle workshop is only available to staff with the Pilot role. See related guidance on the Pilot Role guide.

Peer assessment of student coursework

There are three options for students to assess their peers' coursework.  Each has pros and cons.

Criteria Forum Workshop Peer Assessment
Allow assessment of peer contribution to the group work? Yes No Yes
Allow assessment of peer work (provision of grade)? Yes Yes No
Allow assessment of peer work (provision of feedback)? Yes Yes No
Allow self-assessment (provision of grade)? No Yes No
Allow self-assessment (provision of feedback)? No Yes No
Allow assessment by teacher? Yes Yes Yes
Allow users to input their own formula for calculating the final assessment grade? No No No
Allow in-class and online peer review? Yes Yes Yes
Allow auto allocation of work to students for peer marking? Yes Yes Yes
Allow manual allocation of work to students for peer marking? Yes Yes No
Allow provision of marking criteria/rubric to students for marking? Yes Yes No
Allow integration of peer marks to Moodle gradebook? No Yes Yes
Allow integration of teacher marks to Moodle gradebook? No Yes Yes
Allow integration of peer feedback to Moodle gradebook? No No No
Allow integration of teacher feedback to Moodle gradebook? No No Yes
Allow auto allocation of marks to students for undertaking self-assessment and peer review? No Yes No
Allow completed peer mark and feedback to be returned to student authors automatically? Yes Yes Yes
Allow anonymous peer marking? Yes Yes No
Allow peer marking of off-line assignments? Yes No No
Allow teachers to export all peer feedback in a read-friendly format? No No Yes
Allow non-numeric grading, for example, poor/fair/good/excellent? Yes Yes Yes
Send reminder notification to students when peer marking period starts? No No No

 

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License