An accessibility score indicator icon will display next to uploaded files giving an indication of how accessible it is:
Low (0-33%): The file is not accessible and needs immediate attention.
Medium (34-66%): The file is somewhat accessible and could use improvement.
High (67-99%): The file is accessible but could be improved.
Perfect (100%): The file is accessible. No improvement is needed.
Ally currently checks the following formats:
Ally provides an accessibility score above the text editor as you are writing content and will identify if you have missed a heading level. Select the score to identify the issue and then you can takes steps to remediate the content.
Drag & drop images
If you drag and drop an image into the text editor, Moodle automatically marks it as decorative and will not prompt you to add Alternative Text.
The Accessibility report provides an accessibility summary for the entire module. It provides a systematic way to fix accessibility issues.
A new window will open displaying the overall accessibility score for the module and an overview of content types on the module. To start remediating files the dashboard will arrange issues by how easy they are to fix, low scoring content or by the type of issue. Open the feedback panel to directly apply fixes or upload remediated files. Further information is available from the Course Accessibility Report | Anthology Help.
You may wish to consider disabling the alternative format for a specific file if:
When students select the alternative format icon to download the content in a different format they will receive a message that The alternative formats for this file have been disabled.
You can re-enable alternative formats if required.
No. Even if you have an accessibility solution created, Ally's score for the inaccessible resource will remain low.
Usually as images, requiring alt text to be accessible.
City has consulted with copyright specialists, and we understand that making copies in an alternative format using Ally is covered by what the law permits for educational purposes, or by what relevant licences permit. This might be desirable for ease of accessibility, for example. These copies should not be shared with anyone else; they are for personal use only.
If you have queries regarding copyright at City, University of London please contact the Copyright Librarian, Stephen Penton, stephen.penton@city.ac.uk.
Staff might be worried about meeting a certain accessibility score on their modules.
Ally helpfully guides users on how to create more accessible content and learn how to remediate their resources. However, there are certain accessibility issues that it currently does not check for yet, or some accessibility issues may need a fix on a wider scale. This could be the case if your resource is produced using a template or it belongs to a 3rd party. Therefore, while it is a powerful tool, it should not be taken as the single source of truth for the accessibility of your course content. It may not be possible to have 100% accessibility score on some resources, but anything above 90% is excellent.
You may wish to flag to your students known accessibility issues you cannot remediate yet to manage expectations while you consider alternative solutions.